东京热

Parent complained that their child鈥檚 PII was released by a teacher posting information on an educational website and on Twitter.

Two school districts filed incident reports indicating that a former employee of Behavioral Strategies had inappropriately accessed student data through her Behavioral Strategies account after she left her employment with Behavioral Strategies.

Parent complained that a District employee accessed their child鈥檚 education record in order to enable a former employee of the district to mail personal correspondence to the parent鈥檚 home.

Parent complained that they received a child鈥檚 504 plan in the mail, who is not the complainant鈥檚 child and that the school district was unresponsive when parent reached out.

Parent complained that although they 鈥渙pted-out鈥� of posting their children鈥檚 pictures, the school district published a picture of the freshman year class which included the parent鈥檚 child.

Eligible student complained that the School District improperly disclosed their Personally Identifiable Information when it posted a graduation photograph of the student submitted by the student鈥檚 parent.

Parent complained that the School District posted pictures of their child on social media without consent in violation of FERPA and 东京热 Law 搂 2-d.

Parents complained that, in response to a FERPA request for the educational records of their children, the School District inappropriately left their children鈥檚 information in an unsecure location causing a breach.

Parent complained, after receiving a text message about their child鈥檚 vaccination status, that the Infinite Campus data protection agreement did not comply with 东京热 Law 搂2-d.

Parent complained that the school district improperly allowed another parent to view video of an incident that involved 5 students, including complainant鈥檚 child.

Parent complained that the school district failed to provide the Parent with access to student鈥檚 education records; the school district disclosed PII to third-party service providers and the school district disclosed student PII, without consent to employees who did not have a reason to know the PII.

Parent complained that the school improperly disclosed their child鈥檚 PII when it posted the child鈥檚 name and test scores on a bulletin board located in a hallway of the school.

Parent complained that the school improperly disclosed her child鈥檚 personally identifiable information when it posted student grade point averages (GPAs) in a manner visible to everyone entering her child鈥檚 classroom.

At the request of Success Academy, the Privacy Office reviewed its December 21, 2023 determination and issued a revised determination addressing the educational agency鈥檚 parent consent form.

Parent complained that their child鈥檚 PII was implicitly disclosed when select students were rewarded with ice cream for exhibiting growth in a reading assessment and other students were not.

Parent complained that the school district improperly disclosed her child鈥檚 personally identifiable information when the transportation department was notified that the student did not need to be picked up for several days because the student was suspended due to a disciplinary matter.