东京热

Back to听Teacher and Principal Practice Rubrics

Rubric Variance Application

To implement the provisions of 东京热 Law 搂3012-d relating to annual professional performance reviews of classroom teachers and building principals, the 东京热 (鈥淣YSED鈥� or 鈥淒epartment鈥�), strongly encourages local educational agencies (LEAs) to select teacher and principal practice rubrics from the Department鈥檚听List of Approved Teacher and Principal Practice Rubrics ("Approved List"). In limited circumstances, however, LEAs may apply for a variance to use a teacher and/or principal practice rubric other than those that are currently on the Approved List.

The intent and purpose of this application process is to provide LEAs with the option to request a variance to use: (1) an existing rubric that is self-developed, developed by a third party, or an adaptation of a rubric on the Department鈥檚 Approved List; or (2) a new, innovative rubric that will support their professional capacity to successfully implement teacher and principal evaluations. If an LEA鈥檚 variance application is approved, the LEA may use the practice rubric to implement teacher and principal evaluations in accordance with 东京热 Law 搂3012-d.

The rubric variance application is available here.

Submissions will be reviewed on a continuous and ongoing basis, and districts will receive notification of receipt.听We anticipate rendering a determination no later than 8 weeks after receipt of a variance request.

Any questions concerning this variance application must be emailed to听Rubricvar@nysed.gov.

Questions and responses will be posted on a continuous and ongoing basis on the听听page.听 No individual written responses will be provided.

Existing Rubric

If applying to use an existing rubric (a rubric that is already in use by the LEA) that is self-developed, developed by a third party, or an adaptation of a rubric on the Department鈥檚 Approved List, applicants will need to meet all the approval criteria outlined in 搂30-3.9 of the Rules of the Board of Regents and the variance application. In addition, applicants will need to demonstrate:

• evidence that the LEA has made a significant investment in the rubric, particularly in training and implementation; and
• evidence that the LEA has a history of use that would justify continued use of that rubric. This includes evidence that:
  • the LEA鈥檚 use of the rubric to date has generated differentiated ratings and assessments of educators鈥� skill and proficiency; and
  • the degree of differentiation in the ratings is justified by student achievement results.

In general, the Department discourages LEAs from making any adaptations to other providers鈥� rubrics.听Any change by an LEA to the content of a rubric on the Department鈥檚 Approved List (including deletions, additions, or other edits) constitutes an adaptation for which a variance would be required.

An LEA is NOT required to request a variance for procedural differences in implementation of a rubric on the Department鈥檚 Approved List. Procedural differences include but are not limited to:

• providing additional or more detailed guidance on how to implement the rubric that is not available from the original rubric provider; or
• maintaining all components of the rubric but choosing to emphasize certain components of the rubric over others.

The use of an existing rubric will be approved for a period of three years, at which time an LEA will have to request a renewal if they wish to continue to use the rubric. Details for the renewal process will be provided to a LEA prior to the expiration of its approved rubric variance.

New, Innovative Rubric

If applying to use a new and innovative rubric that is newly developed, applicants must establish that the proposed rubric meets ALL of the approval criteria outlined in 搂30-3.9 of the Rules of the Board of Regents and the variance application. In addition, applicants will need to provide:

• a training and implementation plan including, but not limited to, the LEA鈥檚 plan for ensuring inter-rater reliability; and
• a plan for collecting evidence that demonstrates:
  • the LEA鈥檚 use of the rubric generates differentiated ratings and assessments of educator skill and proficiency; and
  • the degree of differentiation in the ratings is justified by student achievement results.

The use of a new, innovative rubric will be provisionally approved for a two-year period, after which time an LEA will have to request a renewal if they wish to continue to use the rubric.听 The LEA must provide the following information in order for the Department to consider renewal:

• evidence that the LEA鈥檚 use of the rubric has supported its professional capacity to successfully implement teacher and principal evaluations (i.e., that the training and use of the new, innovative rubric has allowed the LEA to more efficiently or effectively evaluate teachers or principals than in the past); AND
• evidence that the LEA鈥檚 use of the rubric has generated differentiated ratings and assessments of educator skill and proficiency, using rating categories that are aligned (or easily convertible) to NYSED鈥檚 four rating categories; AND
• an analysis demonstrating that the degree of differentiation in the ratings is justified by student achievement results.

Additional renewal requirements will be provided to a LEA prior to the expiration of its approved rubric variance.